Vibrating Pole: Mystery Solved
It puzzled me for days — what caused an old aerial pole on a neighbour’s house to oscillate wildly on a seemingly windless day? The answer, it turned out, wasn’t UFOs, but an equally fascinating phenomenon with its explanation rooted firmly in the science of fluid mechanics.
I was genuinely baffled by the mystery of the vibrating aerial pole on my neighbour’s house, which I wrote up in a post a few days ago. The coincidence of there being a UFO sighting in the area on the same day seemed to suggest a connection, and I speculated about whether electro-magnetic field disturbances might be responsible. I posted links to my item in the Unknown Country Forum and on the Fortean Times Bulletin Board. It was in the discussion thread at the FT board that what I now believe to be the answer was suggested (by the appropriately named contributor “misterwibble”): a phenomenon known as Vortex Shedding.
Wikipedia has an entry on vortex shedding, together with an animation that shows what happens when a fluid in motion — such as water or air — meets a solid blunt object (including, as in our case, a cylindrical object):

Von Kármán vortex street animation, courtesy Cesareo de La Rosa Siqueira
The Wikipedia entry explains the effect in detail, including equations for working out how fluids of different velocities passing cylinders of different diameters will produce vortices possessing different qualities, but for our purposes, the animation is enough to make it obvious what is happening — as each vortex is spun off the leeward side of the cylinder, alternating on the left and right sides, pressure-drops are caused on the opposing side which pulls the cylinder first one way, then the other. If the frequency of the production of the vortices corresponds with the resonating frequency of the cylinder, the motion (oscillation) of the cylinder back and forth will be accentuated until, in some cases, the structure will fail.
Vortex shedding is something I’d never heard of before, but now I know about it, it’s the obvious answer. In the case of the aerial pole, only a very light breeze is necessary to make it oscillate because its (presumably) aluminium construction is so thin, as can be seen in this photo, looking up the pole from underneath. When the wind is blowing from east to west, as it has been when I’ve seen the pole oscillating, it’s blowing from directly behind the pole from my viewpoint and towards me, so the movement I see is left to right. At other times — say, when the wind is blowing from south to north — any pole oscillations would be back and forth from my perspective and therefore much more difficult to observe from a distance.
I was confused as to why the pole vibrates in light breezes but not when the wind force is higher. Vortex shedding provides an answer: the pole doesn’t oscillate in higher winds because the frequency with which the vortices are spun off the leeward side of the pole is higher than the pole’s natural resonating frequency, and so it doesn’t react in ‘sympathy’.
Finally, a few videos at YouTube put the icing on the cake, as it were: here’s a traffic light pole being affected by vortex shedding:
Source: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YbZE_dgAqkc
This is a video explaining the phenomenon in the laboratory:
Source: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_AJgEa2dbJU
Lastly, a more light-hearted explanation from some science students, which still gets the science message across:
Source: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=JI0M1gVNhbw
It’s a pity that UFOs weren’t responsible for the wobbly pole. But I’m always happy to admit when I’m wrong — and so, with thanks to all the contributors who helped solve the problem, it’s QED!

John Harley says:
November 20th, 2008
12:10 pm
Bob, you have answered a question that has had me baffled for five years!
Right opposite my house my neighbour also has a mast and very often, for no apparent reason, it will vibrate, often without any discernible breeze being present. Now call me an anorak, but I would often stand there looking up wondering what the hell was making the darned thing buzz and shake like that. I went through theory upon theory in my head, all quite ludicrous, and most involving motors and electricity until I read your piece.
Thank you Bob, you’ve made an old anorak very happy!
Somerset Bob says:
November 20th, 2008
12:41 pm
Hi John — thanks so much for your comment.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s been spying on a neighbour’s pole!
Funny how these things can suddenly grab your attention and then keep you banjaxed for so long. I’m not disappointed to find it has a prosaic, scientific explanation rather than a more exotic reason for doing it. I’m always pleased to learn something new about the way our weird and wonderful world works.
Graham says:
January 13th, 2009
10:57 pm
Wow!
At last an answer to my vibrating tv aerial mast. Exactly as you state – low wind conditions (from certain directions) cause the pole to ‘bow’ then resonate. This was so bad until a few months ago – it sounded like someone had a masonary drill on our gable end wall. I’ve had the pole changed (from 1.5 inch dia to 2 inch dia), length (to 12 ft) and bracket spacing increased to reduce the effect. I’ve even tried since filling the pole (in situ!) with expanding foam. There is still a mild resonance at times – has anyone heard of diy fixes that work (I’m considering trying a helical ‘fence’ though fitting this at the top of an already high up mast may be difficult).
Somerset Bob says:
January 13th, 2009
11:15 pm
Graham — thanks for your comment. Yes, a helical ‘fence’ fitted around the upper section of the pole may be the answer you seek, though as you say, how you get it up there might prove to be rather difficult! Let me know how you get on
David says:
February 8th, 2009
2:16 pm
Hi Bob
I believe this has also been the cause of some crashes involving police motorcycles. The light poles on the back of police Honda and BMW bikes which, along with the excess weight of fully equipped bikes, has been thought to have contributed to high speed weaving and resulting crashes, some of which have been fatal.
best
David
Somerset Bob says:
February 8th, 2009
5:58 pm
Hi David, thanks for popping in.
Wow! That’s amazing. Just goes to show how vortex shedding, if not taken into account, can cause havoc.